Bibliography

Filters: Keyword is Observer Variation  [Clear All Filters]
D
Doust JA, Pietrzak E, Sanders S, Glasziou PP. "Identifying studies for systematic reviews of diagnostic tests was difficult due to the poor sensitivity and precision of methodologic filters and the lack of information in the abstract." J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58(5):444-9. Abstract
G
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. "GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence--inconsistency." J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(12):1294-302. Abstract
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Sultan S, et al. "GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence." J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(12):1311-6. Abstract
H
Hartling L, Ospina M, Liang Y, et al. "Risk of bias versus quality assessment of randomised controlled trials: cross sectional study." BMJ. 2009;339:b4012. Abstract
Hollingworth W, Medina SL, Lenkinski RE, et al. "Interrater reliability in assessing quality of diagnostic accuracy studies using the QUADAS tool. A preliminary assessment." Acad Radiol. 2006;13(7):803-10. Abstract
K
Katrak P, Bialocerkowski AE, Massy-Westropp N, Kumar S, Grimmer KA. "A systematic review of the content of critical appraisal tools." BMC Med Res Methodol. 2004;4:22. Abstract
P
Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N. "Qualitative research in health care. Analysing qualitative data." BMJ. 2000;320(7227):114-6.
S
Shea BJ, Hamel C, Wells GA, et al. "AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews." J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):1013-20. Abstract
W
Whiting PF, Weswood ME, Rutjes AWS, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PNM, Kleijnen J. "Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies." BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:9. Abstract