Bibliography

Filters: Keyword is Great Britain  [Clear All Filters]
D
Dalziel K, Round A, Stein K, Garside R, Castelnuovo E, Payne L. "Do the findings of case series studies vary significantly according to methodological characteristics?" Health Technol Assess. 2005;9(2):iii-iv, 1-146. Abstract
M
MacLehose RR, Reeves BC, Harvey IM, Sheldon TA, Russell IT, Black AM. "A systematic review of comparisons of effect sizes derived from randomised and non-randomised studies." Health Technol Assess. 2000;4(34):1-154. Abstract
Moher D, Pham B, Lawson ML, Klassen TP. "The inclusion of reports of randomised trials published in languages other than English in systematic reviews." Health Technol Assess. 2003;7(41):1-90. Abstract
N
Nixon J, Duffy S, Armstrong N, et al. "The usefulness of the NHS Economic Evaluation Database to researchers undertaking technology assessment reviews." Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004;20(3):249-57. Abstract
P
Pope C, Mays N. "Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: an introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research." BMJ. 1995;311(6996):42-5. Abstract
R
Royle P, Waugh N. "Should systematic reviews include searches for published errata?" Health Info Libr J. 2004;21(1):14-20. Abstract
Royle P, Waugh N. "Literature searching for clinical and cost-effectiveness studies used in health technology assessment reports carried out for the National Institute for Clinical Excellence appraisal system." Health Technol Assess. 2003;7(34):iii, ix-x, 1-51. Abstract
S
Schünemann HJ, Schünemann HAJ, Oxman AD, et al. "Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies." BMJ. 2008;336(7653):1106-10.
W
Whiting P, Rutjes AWS, Dinnes J, Reitsma J, Bossuyt PMM, Kleijnen J. "Development and validation of methods for assessing the quality of diagnostic accuracy studies." Health Technol Assess. 2004;8(25):iii, 1-234. Abstract